Should the defining verdict for "Truth" be based on facts or feelings?  Is justice served if biased feelings corrupt the jury?

We assume Christianity aligns itself with Messiah’s faith.  The facts will surprise you.  An article every Christian should read.

"Yeshua Judaism": the Torah faith Yeshua (Jesus) came to reestablish and to reform from elitist and burdensome corruption.  How does it differ from "normal" Judaism?

Doesn’t it make sense that Christians should define and study the same Scripture as Messiah and all his original followers?  Do they?

Judaism based counter-missionaries argue against the New Testament's teaching of vicarious atonement. Maybe they should consult their own religion.  It also teaches it!

The title says it all.  Need I say more?

It is impossible to fully understand Scripture without "oral Torah".  Those who reject "oral Torah" do not really reject it, they simply reject the "oral Torah" that differs with their own.

This is such an obvious proof, I am at a loss to understand how anyone can deny it.

What is "preexistence"?  Do accurate definitions matter?  Is there NON-literal preexistence?  Once again, Christian leaders are misinforming you.

The obvious and overwhelming examples of distinction between God and Messiah irrefutably proves Yeshua is NOT "God in the flesh"

It is all assumed.  We compare "assumed" proofs of Messiah's deity to  common sense "necessary inference" disproof.

Peter clearly states who Messiah was.  Christianity rejects Peter's statement.

Many Christians and Messianics assume that when Messiah is worshiped that it proves he is God. They believe it because their leaders teach it. They are easily proven wrong.

Why are most Christians actually Christians?  Did they study, simply adopt their family traditions, marry into it? Is it all a big experiential “love in” where they get their social and emotional needs met? Why?